CNN, CNBC, And WSJ Mislead Investors
CNN, CNBC, and The Wall Street Journal all sensationalized last week's rise in yield on the 10-year Treasury bond to 3%.
It's a classic example of why investors are so shortsighted and poorly informed about financial economics.
A segment that aired on CNN's popular early morning program, New Day, and a video posted on CNNMoney.com reported that the benchmark 10-year Treasury yield last Tuesday hit 3% for the first time since 2014.
"Short term rates are also on the rise, leading to what's known as a flattening yield curve," according to a tease for the segment. "Christine Romans explains why these signals are freaking out the stock market." Ms. Romans is CNN's chief business correspondent.
The front page of The Wall Street Journal also made the 3%-bond yield milestone sound ominous, hinting at a possible end to the bull market on its front page.
The frightening headlines are misleading.
Contrary to CNN's coverage, the yield curve did not flatten lately. Since early April, the yield curve actually steepened slightly, as bond yields have risen while the Fed funds rate stayed about the same. Since January, the entire yield curve shifted higher, according to data from an independent economist whose research and data we license. This is a lot different from what CNN reported.
And, contrary to The Wall Street Journal's alarming front page headline, rising bond yields have actually often coincided with bull markets in stocks.
The red arrows point to five periods since the 1990s when the yield on the 10-year U.S. Treasury bond rose sharply and stock prices rose at the same time.
Moreover, contrary to popular belief, there is no historic evidence that rising bond yields are bad for stocks. In fact, many episodes of rising bond yields have coincided with a bull market in stocks. Also, the stock market has done just fine when the absolute level of bond yields was much higher than today.
The Standard & Poor's 500 index on Friday closed at 2669.91, unchanged for the week.
Stocks are not far from their all-time high. Prices are reasonable, considering the extremely strong earnings growth of 20% expected in 2018, which is much higher than the historical annual norm of 7.4%.*
Despite the frightening headlines, increased stock market volatility, and the weak returns on stocks in the first quarter, very strong economic fundamentals remain in place.
Financial economics is hard. We are wealth management professionals and are a source of intelligent analysis.
Note: *2017 (estimated), 2018 (estimated) and 2019 (estimated) bottom-up S&P 500 operating earnings per share as of April 3, 2018: for 2017(e), $131.98; for 2018(e), $157.99; for 2019(e), $173.97. Sources: Yardeni Research, Inc. and Thomson Reuters I/B/E/S for actual and estimated operating earnings from 2015. Standard and Poor's for index price data as of March 29, 2018; and actual operating earnings data through 2014.
This article was written by a veteran financial journalist based on data compiled and analyzed by independent economist, Fritz Meyer. While these are sources we believe to be reliable, the information is not intended to be used as financial advice without consulting a professional about your personal situation. Indices are unmanaged and not available for direct investment. Investments with higher return potential carry greater risk for loss. Past performance is not an indicator of your future results.
- How Long Does It Take To Be A Long-Term Investor?
- Five Observations About The CBO's New Long-Term Debt Forecast
- Fed Apology, Strong Job Growth Bolster Stocks
- Despite Grim Headlines, Economic Growth Is Intact
- Despite December Turbulence, Economy And Business Optimism Were Strong
- Latest Forecasts Show Economy Is Doing Okay
- A Poignant Moment In Financial History Sparks Stocks